Machine Metacognition: Estimating Neural-Network Uncertainty

Under Review
confidence estimationneural networksmelanomacalibrationhuman-AI

Can the neighbourhood around an image in a network’s learned representation add useful information about the reliability of its prediction?

Looking beyond the output score

A neural network can make a confident mistake. Peter Kvam and I investigate whether the structure of its learned representations provides information about uncertainty beyond the output-layer scores.

A signal from nearby examples

Our method examines neighbouring examples in a network’s representation space. Inspired by cognitive accounts of familiarity and confidence, it combines this neighbourhood information with the network’s outputs to estimate classification uncertainty.

Current evidence

In an offline melanoma-image study, a classifier using both output scores and neighbourhood information discriminated cases better than one using output scores alone. The manuscript and public preprint describe this model comparison; the work remains under review.

The practical next question is how people interpret and act on such signals. The current study does not test clinician decisions or a human–AI intervention. Work on uncertainty estimation provides the basis for those behavioural experiments, rather than evidence of their outcome.

Related Publications

  • Bennett, M. S., & Kvam, P. D. (2026). Machine metacognition improves classification performance and uncertainty quantification. Under Review. DOI

Back to Research